Dr. Walter Jones III is a friend of ROCK’s and has several years experience of working on issues that impact families and communities. Today he writes about the impact of viewing pornography at the workplace. Please join us in welcoming him to the ROCK blog!
The Internet’s provision of quick-click gratification has now facilitated pornography consumption to become not only unlimited, but unrestrained as well. According to Craig Gross, quoted at InternetSafety.com, “Everyone with access to the Internet is either targeted, tempted or in the trenches regarding Internet porn.” Gross is the founder of XXXChurch, part of a growing network of addiction ministries.
In the 2009 movie “Fireproof,” actor Kirk Cameron plays Caleb Holt—a husband and firefighter—whose marriage is headed for divorce because of a multitude of marital stressors, one of which is his addiction to Internet pornography. In the film, Holt’s lust is indulged in broad daylight and on open display before his wife as she passes him staring at his computer monitor—in their dining room—with the monitor unashamedly positioned for public viewing.
Today porn consumption is no longer carefully and clandestinely confined to the world of dark shadows and private, personal use. It has crossed an even more disturbing line: from the home into the workplace.
On a recent Fox News report of an incident in Australia, a man being interviewed on television stands several feet in front of a work colleague (who had his back to the interviewing camera—but whose computer monitor was facing the camera). The colleague, it turned out, was viewing photos of scantily clad women on his computer. After several moments, he turned around in utter mortification that he and his salacious surfing had been captured on live video for all to see!
Back in the United States, two recent reports by The Washington Times revealed widespread workplace viewing of Internet pornography by employees at the National Science Foundation (NSF)—a taxpayer-funded federal agency—and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Concerning NSF, the Times reports:
[O]ne senior executive spent at least 331 days looking at pornography on his government computer and chatting online with nude or partially clad women without being detected, the records show.
When finally caught, the NSF official retired. He even offered, among other explanations, a humanitarian defense, suggesting that he frequented the porn sites to provide a living to the poor overseas women. Investigators put the cost to taxpayers of the senior official’s porn surfing at between $13,800 and about $58,000.
‘He explained that these young women are from poor countries and need to make money to help their parents and this site helps them do that,’ investigators wrote in a memo.
Another employee in a different case was caught with hundreds of pictures, videos and even PowerPoint slide shows containing pornography. Asked by an investigator whether he had completed any government work on a day when a significant amount of pornography was downloaded, the employee responded, ‘Um, I can’t remember,’ according to records.
The problems at the [NSF] were so pervasive they swamped the agency’s inspector general and forced the internal watchdog to cut back on its primary mission of investigating grant fraud and recovering misspent tax dollars.
Similarly, concerning employees at the SEC:
The work computer of one regional supervisor…showed more than 1,800 attempts to look up pornography in a 17-day span: ‘It was kind of distraction per se,’ he later told investigators.
…[T]he inspector general found that during a 17-day period, he received about 1,880 ‘access denials,’ wherein the computer system blocked his attempts to view Web sites that were deemed pornographic.
The supervisor later told an IG investigator that despite the blocked attempts, he still had been looking at pornography at work up to twice a day and it had ‘probably occurred for a long time.’
Disciplinary actions at NSF ranged from counseling to suspension to termination. Penalties at SEC included referral to the inspector general for investigation, as well as suspension or other reprimand. Some employees resigned.
HealthyMind.com reports the following 2003 statistics regarding Internet porn in the workplace:
• 70 percent of all Internet porn traffic occurs during the 9-to-5 workday
• Nearly one out of three companies has terminated an employee for inappropriate web use.
• 20% of men admit accessing pornography at work
• 13% of women admit accessing pornography at work
The activities of porn-surfing SEC workers, a small fraction of the overall work force, have been serious enough to warrant a mention in each of the past four semiannual reports sent to Congress by the SEC’s office of inspector general.
Additionally, statistics compiled by Family Safe Media reveal that in 2006, Louisville ranked fifth out of ten U.S. cities in Internet keyword searches for “porn” and fourth in searches for “sex.”
At the end of the day, as the Times reports, employee viewing of pornography via the Internet is an increasing problem that is embarrassing, oftentimes undetectable, and expensive. According to Allan Bachman, education manager for the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, such employees are “simply…stealing time. They’re getting paid to do something that they’re not supposed to be doing.”